Avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro

Avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro update#
Avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro pro#
Avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro software#

Nearly all of the films nominated for the Academy Awards for Best Picture (as well as all the films nominated for Best Editing) were edited using Avid Media Composer. In my introductory lecture I explain the following.ДЄvid Media Composer is (still) the industry standard editing software. I now teach Avid (part-time) to MA film students in London and meet similar reactions from those who are having to come from (principally) Premeire. These stem from it's adoption in the features/professional world as well as the financial rewards that often follow when you're a top Avid editor in these industries.ДЄs a (now) retired editor who spent over 30 years working on Avid (as well as brief stints on Premiere and FCP), I've seen many people confidently announce the death of MC - all of which have not come to pass.

Avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro software#

It's always easy to assume that one's personal experience is the same as everyone else's experience, but Avid Media Composer obviously has some serious advantage over other editing software in certain workflows, otherwise professional editors wouldn't be using it.ДЇor someone coming from (say) Adobe Premere, it can be a bit of a shock to learn MC, but there are valid reasons to persevere. Am I wrong? Does anybody else feel the same way? What about it can you tell me in order to let me know that IвЂ™m wrong? I just wanna have a discussion about the Avid.

I HAVE to learn Avid, and I know itвЂ™s good to know as many programs and jobs as possible in this industry. am I wrong? Is there something about Avid that IвЂ™m not giving a proper chance? The thing is, IвЂ™m mostly just bitching. ItвЂ™s unintuitive, overly complicated, and the interface actually LOOKS like it was invented by a dinosaur and hasnвЂ™t changed since. I absolutely canвЂ™t stand it, even though IвЂ™m becoming relatively proficient at it. So IвЂ™ve been at it for a few very frustrating months, learning on the Avid. This year, after pretty much mastering Premiere, IвЂ™m now being made to learn Avid, as Avid is the industry standard in most major production circles. Far more intuitive than anything else IвЂ™ve tried.

Avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro pro#

I learned years ago on Premiere Pro, and in my opinion, Premiere Pro is the premiere video editing software. IвЂ™m in my second year of film school, going for my BFA in video editing. In an industry that is so based on doing work efficiently, in a time crunch, that one doesnвЂ™t want deleted, why do editors still choose to use the buggiest choice in software?

There isnвЂ™t even a save function because itвЂ™s automatic and NEVER loses work. It pretty much never crashes, and on the once in a blue moon chance that it does crash, it doesnвЂ™t lose work ever. I understand why the industry switched from Final Cut when X first came out, but at this point, Final Cut is imo the best application out there.

Avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro update#

People still use old versions and refuse to update for fear of crashes, and I have a friend who on his first day of assistant editing, the main editor had to call Avid support 3 times to deal with separate problems. As for Avid, once you learn it itвЂ™s fine, but to learn itвЂ™s a complete mess. But it crashes so often and has so many flaws that I canвЂ™t figure out why editors still use it.

As a program that can get the job done, itвЂ™s fine. IвЂ™ve never heard someone talk highly of the Premiere user experience. My closest editing friend does casting editing and everyone uses Premiere. I do freelance work as well as work for myself, and I have friends who work in the industry.